STAIRSSelf-Assessment Tool for Appraising the Investment Readiness of Sustainable InfrastructureStart
Introduction
Welcome to the Self-Assessment Tool for Appraising Investment Readiness in Sustainable Infrastructure (STAIRS), developed by the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN-DESA) through its Financing for Sustainable Development Office. This tool assists countries in building a robust pipeline of high-quality sustainable infrastructure projects that significantly advance the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). With a focus on public-private partnership (PPP) projects, STAIRS aims to enhance the presentation and promotion of investment-ready opportunities.
STAIRS evaluates projects based on essential criteria, including SDG alignment, financial viability, environmental and social impact, and technological innovation. Developed in response to growing demand from planning and investment professionals, STAIRS seeks to increase the number of bankable sustainable infrastructure projects.
Structure of STAIRS
STAIRS is organized into two distinct stages to facilitate your evaluation
Stage 1: Pre-screener
The Pre-screener stage provides a quick initial assessment of your project’s readiness, consisting of two sections:
Section I: Basic Information: This section gathers basic information about the project, including the country of origin, region, project type, a brief description of the project and the project’s financial profile, including capital structure and cash flows.
Section II: Initial Readiness Questions: This section requires the respondent to answer 10 key questions out of a total of 48, which assess the project's readiness. Specific sub-questions are triggered only if the minimum threshold is met. Before generating a score for this stage, the tool also incorporates the project's country score from the World Bank's Infrastructure Development Preparedness Benchmark, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation. Responses are rated on a five-point scale, and projects scoring 2.84 or higher will proceed to the Complete Self-Assessment, carrying forward all answers from the Pre-screener. If the project does not meet the minimum threshold, further development is recommended.
Stage 2: Complete Self-Assessment
In this stage, your project undergoes a detailed evaluation across three pillars, focusing on various aspects of project readiness:
- Pillar 1 - Project Readiness/Preparedness: This pillar consists of 5 factors and 30 questions. It assesses overall readiness through evaluations of financing, approvals, risk identification, alignment with international benchmarks, etc.
- Pillar 2 - SDG Alignment and Contributions: This pillar consists of 1 factor and 7 questions. It evaluates the project’s alignment with and contributions to the SDGs, including development of metrics for effective tracking and analysis.
- Pillar 3 - Management Quality and Investment Track Record: This pillar consists of 2 factors and 11 questions. It reviews the experience of the country or project sponsor in executing previous PPP projects, assessing the project team’s execution capacity, resource availability, and ability to secure external expertise.
Scoring methodology
The factors, sub-factors, or questions within the three pillars are assessed, scored, and weighted individually. Each question is designed to elicit one of five responses and is scored on a scale from 1 to 5 accordingly. For example, Pillar 1/Factor 1/Question 1a, with an assigned weight of 0.3%, is: “Is there an approved national/regional/local public investment plan?” The possible answers are: (1) Not yet started, (2) Just started, (3) In process, progress being made, (4) Significant progress made, (5) Completed. Depending on the answer, a weighted score is computed. For example, if a respondent answers “Just started,” the score is 2, and the weighted score will be 0.12 (2 * 0.3 / 5). All weighted scores from the questions under each pillar are aggregated, and a pillar-wise score and a final score are computed after all 48 questions are answered.

Note: Some questions require a different set of responses, ranging from Lowest, to Low, Moderate, High and Highest.
Based on the final score, the project is classified into one of five categories:

- Ideation Phase: Represents the lowest level of preparedness, with a score below 1.
- Mapping Phase: Reflects a below-average level of preparedness, with a score between 1 and 2.
- Development Phase: Indicates an average level of preparedness with a score between 2 and 3.
- Refinement Phase: Signifies a high level of preparedness, with a score between 3 and 4.
- Presentation Phase: Demonstrates a very high level of preparedness, with a score above